AI is taking up more of the workweek.
76.5% report 5+ hours per week with AI for work, and 55.7% report 10+ hours. For this audience, AI is becoming a regular work surface rather than an occasional assist.
Respondent Preview / April 2026
Among AIDB's AI-forward audience, the April signal is operational: AI is not just making known tasks faster, it is taking up more of the work surface and helping people attempt more consequential work.
April shows the post-adoption pattern settling into work: AI is a larger work surface, delegated use is a majority behavior, and the strongest blockers are capacity, skill, access, and organizational friction rather than belief.
76.5% report 5+ hours per week with AI for work, and 55.7% report 10+ hours. For this audience, AI is becoming a regular work surface rather than an occasional assist.
66.4% used automated or agentic workflows in April. Separately, 55.9% say they have used OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, or another tool to build agents.
Output/throughput leads at 41.4%, but new capabilities are close behind at 28.9%; time saving is only 10.5%.
Strategic planning is selected as highest-value by 14.2% while only 7.0% call it their most common use case, a +7.2 point leverage gap.
The low-value objection is nearly absent. The real constraints are time to learn, skill gaps, policy barriers, and tool access.
The Value Read
Throughput is still the biggest named benefit, but time saving is a relatively small slice of the story. April's more durable signal is that respondents are using AI to expand what they can attempt.
Leverage Gap
Strategic planning has the largest positive gap between common use and highest-value use. That matters because it points away from simple task acceleration and toward judgment-heavy work.
Operational Reality
Only 0.2% say they do not see enough value. The constraints that remain are learning time, skill, policy, and tool access: the practical machinery of making AI useful at work.
Methodology